Untimely Arrests and Dismissals of Criminal Charges
When the circumstances surrounding a crime are complex, the police may need time to investigate the case before arresting a suspect. They may need to gather and analyze evidence, interview victims and witnesses, and consult with prosecutors before determining who may have been responsible for the crime. The timing for an arrest is usually flexible, as long as the statute of limitations for the crime has not expired. (Each crime has its own statute of limitations in each state, while murder and certain other serious crimes have no statute of limitations.) In some situations, however, the police may delay so long in arresting a suspect that they cannot make an effective defense. A court may dismiss a charge or overturn a conviction if an arrest is greatly delayed, and the police and prosecution do not have a reasonable justification for the delay.
Statute of limitations = the time within which the law prescribes that a criminal prosecution must begin (ranging from a few months to multiple years from when the crime was committed, depending on the severity of the crime – some of the most serious crimes, like murder, have no statute of limitations)
Reasons for Dismissal Based on an Untimely Arrest
There is no specific provision in the Constitution that contains a right to a timely arrest, similar to the right to a speedy trial. However, a defendant may make a due process argument that they did not have a right to a fair trial if the arrest was greatly delayed. They will need to provide a thorough explanation of how the delay undermined their defense. A general argument that a long delay naturally caused the decay or disappearance of evidence will not be enough to get the charge dismissed. For example, defendants have not prevailed when they alleged that they could no longer find certain witnesses to testify for them, without explaining the relevance of their testimony to the case.
The Fifth Amendment due process clause applies to the federal government, while the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause applies to the states.
Courts in some states will dismiss a charge or throw out a conviction on the basis of an untimely arrest only if law enforcement intentionally caused a delay. The delay also must have furthered the prosecution’s case. Perhaps it prevented the defendant from presenting witness testimony that would have supported an alibi or suggested that someone else committed the crime. Similar to the situation above, the defendant must show that the delay not only was intentional but also was material to the outcome of the case. A court will not rule for the defendant if the delay did not affect the relative strengths and weaknesses of each side’s arguments.
In still other states, the defendant does not have the burden of proving that the police or prosecution intentionally caused the delay to help their case or undermine the defendant’s case. The defendant simply needs to show that their case was in fact undermined by the delay, and then the prosecution will need to show that there was a justification for the delay. The judge will consider the degree to which the delay hampered the defense and the strength of the prosecution’s justification. If the effect of the delay was significant, and the prosecution does not have a strong justification for it, the judge may find that the delay violated due process. This burden shifting system and balancing test tends to be more favorable to defendants than the tests above.
Criminal Law Center Contents
-
Criminal Law Center
- Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Criminal Sentencing Law
- Bail, Bonds, and Relevant Legal Concerns
- Restitution for Victims in Criminal Law
- Plea Bargains in Criminal Law Cases
- Receiving Immunity for Testimony in a Criminal Law Case
- Legal Classification of Criminal Offenses
- Common Criminal Defenses
-
Criminal Procedure Law
- Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Law Cases
- Criminal Appeals
- Motions for a New Trial in Criminal Law Cases
- Competency to Stand Trial in Criminal Law Cases
- Continuances in Criminal Law Cases
- Judgments of Acquittal in Criminal Trials
- Joint Trials for Criminal Defendants & Legal Considerations
- Immigration Removal Proceedings & Criminal Law Concerns
- Miranda Rights for Criminal Suspects Under the Law
- Police Stops on the Street & Your Legal Rights
- Video or Audio Recording of Police Officers & Your Legal Rights
- Arrests and Arrest Warrants
- Constitutional Rights in Criminal Law Proceedings
- The Right to a Speedy Trial in a Criminal Law Case
- The Right to a Public Trial in a Criminal Law Case
- Double Jeopardy & Legal Protections for Criminal Defendants
- Discovery in Criminal Law Cases
- Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Law
- Stages of a Criminal Case
- Stages of a Criminal Trial
- The Search Warrant Requirement in Criminal Investigations & Legal Exceptions
- Limits on Searches and Seizures in Criminal Investigations by Law Enforcement
- Qualified Immunity
- Criminal Statutes of Limitations: 50-State Survey
- Types of Criminal Offenses
- Alcohol Crimes Under the Law
- Parole and Probation Law
- Expungement and Sealing of Criminal Records
- Offenses Included in Other Crimes Under the Law
- The Mental State Requirement in Criminal Law Cases
- Derivative Responsibility in Criminal Law Cases
- Working with a Criminal Lawyer
- Criminal Law FAQs
- Domestic Violence Restraining Orders Laws and Forms: 50-State Survey
- Abortion Laws: 50-State Survey
- Gun Laws: 50-State Survey
- Hate Crime Laws: 50-State Survey
- Death Penalty Laws: 50-State Survey
- Recording Phone Calls and Conversations Under the Law: 50-State Survey
- Criminal Law Topics
- Find a Criminal Law Lawyer
-
Related Areas